Cereceres v. Walgreen Co dba Walgreens 10308 S PPT
| Dennis Cereceres |
| Walgreen Co. doing business as Walgreens 10308 S PPT |
| 1:2020cv03406 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Philip A Brimmer |
| Nina Y Wang |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
SCHEDULING ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 2/4/2021. (bwilk, )
|
| Filing 24 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Scheduling Conference held on 2/4/2021 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Discovery due by 11/19/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 12/17/2021. A Final Pretrial Conference is set for 2/8/2022 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall file their proposed pretrial order through CM/ECF and include a courtesy copy of the proposed order in Word format sent by email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the conference. FTR: NYW-FTR. (bwilk, ) |
| Filing 23 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Walgreen Co.. (Mitchell, Sarah) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 18 December 2020. IT IS ORDERED that a Scheduling Conference is set February 4, 2021 at 10:30 a.m., via telephone conference. All participants shall use the following dial-in information: 888-363-4749, Access Code: 5738976#. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/28/2021. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 21 Defendant REPLY in Support of #16 MOTION to Dismiss Negligence Claim filed by Defendant Walgreen Co.. (Mitchell, Sarah) Modified on 12/15/2020 to edit text. (sphil, ). |
|
Filing 20
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/07/2020. Text Only Entry (pabsec2)
|
|
Filing 19
MINUTE ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/7/2020 re: #14 Order to Show Cause. ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause, Docket No. #14 , is hereby discharged. (rvill, )
|
| Filing 18 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #14 by Defendant Walgreen Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Mitchell, Sarah) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE to #16 MOTION to Dismiss Negligence Claim filed by Plaintiff Dennis Cereceres. (Holton, Corey) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss Negligence Claim by Defendant Walgreen Co.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Mitchell, Sarah) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #5 Complaint by Walgreen Co..(Mitchell, Sarah) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/18/2020. ORDERED that, on or before November 30, 2020, defendant Walgreens Co. shall show cause why this case should not be remanded to state court due to the Court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/18/2020, re: #11 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Withdraw and Replace an Exhibit to the Notice of Removal is GRANTED. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Kenneth H. Lyman on behalf of Walgreen Co.Attorney Kenneth H. Lyman added to party Walgreen Co.(pty:dft) (Lyman, Kenneth) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify Exhibit J to Notice of Removal by Defendant Walgreen Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Mitchell, Sarah) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Julia Helena Barotz on behalf of Dennis CereceresAttorney Julia Helena Barotz added to party Dennis Cereceres(pty:pla) (Barotz, Julia) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Corey A. Holton on behalf of Dennis CereceresAttorney Corey A. Holton added to party Dennis Cereceres(pty:pla) (Holton, Corey) |
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 7 STATE COURT ORDER GRANTING Defendant Walgreen Company's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. By Elizabeth Beebe Volz, District Court Judge, Arapahoe County on 11/10/2020. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Summons and Complaint upon Walgreen Co. on 10/20/2020. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Walgreen Co., filed by Dennis Cereceres.(jsalz, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 3 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Mitchell, Sarah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walgreen Co dba Walgreens 10308 S PPT from Arapahoe County District Court, Case Number 2020cv32021. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-7592665), filed by Walgreen Co dba Walgreens 10308 S PPT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J)(Mitchell, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cereceres v. Walgreen Co dba Walgreens 10308 S PPT | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walgreen Co. doing business as Walgreens 10308 S PPT | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth H. Lyman |
| Represented By: | Sarah Jane Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dennis Cereceres | |
| Represented By: | Julia Helena Barotz |
| Represented By: | Corey A. Holton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
