Nelson v. Gallagher et al
Brett Andrew Nelson |
Lewis T. Babcock and Gordon Gallagher |
1:2020cv03424 |
November 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Christine M Arguello |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER: Denying as Moot #10 Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/4/2021. Text Only Entry(cmasec) |
Filing 12 RECORD ON APPEAL filed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Brett Andrew Nelson. Volume I - Pleadings; (USCA Case No. 20-1426). TEXT ONLY ENTRY (evana, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER IMPOSING FILING RESTRICTIONS. That Brett Andrew Nelson is prohibited from filing any new action in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado without the representation of a licensed attorney admitted to practice in the District of Colorado unless he obtainspermission to proceed pro se as described in this order. That the clerk of the Court shall add Brett Andrew Nelson to the list of sanctioned litigants, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/28/2020. (evana, ) |
Filing 10 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Plaintiff Brett Andrew Nelson. (athom, ) |
Filing 9 USCA Case Number 20-1426 for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Brett Andrew Nelson. (evana, ) |
Filing 8 LETTER Transmitting Notice of Appeal to all counsel advising of the transmittal of the #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Brett Andrew Nelson to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (Pro Se, Fee not paid and 1915 motion not filed,) (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Preliminary Record)(evana, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #5 Order Dismissing Case, and #6 Clerk's Judgment, by Plaintiff Brett Andrew Nelson. (evana, ) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #5 Order of Dismissal on December 1, 2020. (rvill, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER of Dismissal. It is ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #3 ) is granted. The Complaint (ECF No. #1 ), the pleading titled "Claim and Action of Trespass; Abuse of Process; Deprivation of Rights Under the Colour [sic] of Authority Conspiracy to Deprive Rights" (ECF No. #2 ), and the action are dismissed as frivolous, malicious, and abusive. It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order why the filing restrictions specified in this order should not be imposed. If Plaintiff fails to show good cause within the time allowed, the filing restrictions specified in this order will be imposed. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on December 1, 2020. (rvill, ) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Brett Andrew Nelson. (trvo, ) |
Filing 2 Claim and Action of Trespass; Abuse of Process; Deprivation of Rights Under the Colour of Authority Conspiracy to Deprive Rights, filed by Brett Andrew Nelson.(trvo, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lewis T. Babcock, Gordon Gallagher, filed by Brett Andrew Nelson.(trvo, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.