Johnson v. USA
R. Rardin |
Eric Lamont Johnson |
USA |
1:2020cv03500 |
November 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 11 OBJECTION to #9 Report and Recommendations filed by Petitioner Eric Lamont Johnson. (sphil, ) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify #6 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Eric Lamont Johnson. (sphil, ) |
Filing 9 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/17/2020, re #6 Add and Terminate Parties, Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eric Lamont Johnson. (sphil, ) |
|
|
Filing 6 AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241, filed by Eric Lamont Johnson.(sphil, ) |
Filing 5 LETTER by Petitioner Eric Lamont Johnson. (angar, ) |
|
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee: $5, Receipt Number: COX097266), filed by Eric Lamont Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(trvo, ) |
Filing 1 DISREGARD, FILED IN ERROR Administrative Notice: No initiating document. Attorney contacted with instructions to file the initiating document within 24 hours. (Text Only Entry) (alave, ) Modified on 11/30/2020 (alave, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.