Liberty Global, Inc. v. USA
Plaintiff: Liberty Global, Inc.
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2020cv03501
Filed: November 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: R Brooke Jackson
Referring Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7422
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, and to File Proposed Scheduling Order. Defendant's answer is now due by 3/3/2021. The parties Proposed Scheduling Order is due by 3/26/2021. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 1/25/2021. Text Only Entry(rbjsec.)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, and to File Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Golden, Jennifer)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jennifer Yu Golden on behalf of USAAttorney Jennifer Yu Golden added to party USA(pty:dft) (Golden, Jennifer)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Thomas James Sawyer on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Thomas James Sawyer added to party USA(pty:dft) (Sawyer, Thomas)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant(s) USA served on 12/3/2020, answer due 2/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service on J. Dunn, #2 Exhibit Proof of Service on W. Barr, #3 Exhibit Proof of Service on M. Desmond)(Madan, Rajiv)
December 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDE: In light of the reassignment of this case to this Court the Scheduling Conference set 3/3/2021 before Magistrate Judge Wang is vacated. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this Court will not hold a scheduling conference. The Court requests that counsel confer and attempt to agree on a schedule and submit a proposed scheduling order by 2/24/2021 pointing out any areas of disagreement. Please email the proposed order to Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov in Word format and efile into CM/ECF. The Court will review the proposed order and make such rulings as are appropriate and will provide the parties with potential trial preparation conference and trial dates for you to choose from. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 12/15/2020. Text Only Entry (rbjsec. )
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/14/2020. In light of #9 Memorandum Returning Case and the reassignment of this matter to the Honorable R. Brooke Jackson, the Scheduling Conference set for March 3, 2020 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang is VACATED. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. This case is randomly returned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-3501-RBJ (angar, )
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #7 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-03501-LTB. (Text Only Entry) (nmarb, )
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Liberty Global, Inc. All parties do not consent.. (Madan, Rajiv)
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/30/20 Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference. Consent Form due by 2/17/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 2/24/2021. Telephonic Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 3/3/2021 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
November 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, )
November 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, )
November 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Liberty Global PLC for Liberty Global, Inc.. (Madan, Rajiv)
November 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Rajiv Madan on behalf of Liberty Global, Inc. (Madan, Rajiv)
November 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-7606821)Attorney Rajiv Madan added to party Liberty Global, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Liberty Global, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Madan, Rajiv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liberty Global, Inc. v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Jennifer Yu Golden
Represented By: Thomas James Sawyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Liberty Global, Inc.
Represented By: Rajiv Madan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?