Fanner v. TTEC-F-K-A Telle Tech Holdings Inc
| Jamie Fanner |
| TTEC-F-K-A Telle Tech Holdings Inc |
| 1:2020cv03507 |
| November 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/25/21. Consent Form due by 2/15/2021. Telephonic Status Conference set for 3/1/2021 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. A copy of this Minute Order shall be sent to: Jamie Fanner, P.O. Box 141, Frisco, TX 75034. (Copy sent as requested.) (nmarb, )
|
| Filing 20 CERTIFICATE of Service by Mail by Clerk of Court of 19 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File, to Jamie Fanner, P.O. Box 141, Frisco TX 75034. Text Only Entry (nmarb, ) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/13/2021. This matter comes before the court on three motions filed by Plaintiff. First, the court CONSTRUES #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File as a Response to Defendant's #8 Motion for an Extension of Time and is therefore not a proper motion. Further, consistent with Magistrate Judge Gallagher's order stating that "[i]f and when the case is drawn to a presiding judge, Defendant will be properly served and ordered to file a responsive pleading," Defendant is ORDERED to file a responsive pleading on or before January 29, 2021. Second, the court STRIKES #10 Motion for Default Judgment, because Plaintiff may not seek default judgment until and unless the Clerk of the Court first enters default against Defendant, which has not happened. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. Third, and finally, the court DENIES #16 Motion for Leave to Restrict, because the use of the initials of Plaintiff's minor children is consistent with Rule 5.2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the court finds no justification for restricting Plaintiff's Motions to proceed in forma pauperis. See Slivka v. Young Mens Christian Ass'n of Pikes Peak Region, 390 F. Supp. 3d 1283, 1288 (D. Colo. 2019) (explaining that a motion to restrict will be granted only if the movant can "articulate a real and substantial interest that justifies depriving the public of access to documents that inform the courts decision-making process."). The Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, )
|
| Filing 18 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (athom, ) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER DRAWING CASE. The Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF Nos. #11 and #12 ) are denied as moot. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 01/12/2021. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-03507-NYW. (athom, )
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Restrict by Plaintiff Jamie Fanner. (athom, ) |
| Filing 15 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number COX097684 (cpomm, ) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on January 4, 2021. Counsel for Defendant TTEC has filed a Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. #8 ). No answer or other response from Defendant is required at this time. Service of process is premature until the Court has completed initial review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(a). If and when the case is drawn to a presiding judge, Defendant will be properly served and ordered to file a responsive pleading. (rvill, )
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER. It is ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff must show cause in writing and filed with the Court as to why the IFP Application (ECF No. #12 ) should not be denied. With her written response, she must also submit a complete and amended IFP application demonstrating that she is financially unable to pay the filing fee. In the alternative to showing cause in writing, Plaintiff may pay the $402.00 filing fee. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on January 4, 2021. (rvill, )
|
| Filing 12 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Plaintiff Jamie Fanner. (athom, ) |
| Filing 11 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Plaintiff Jamie Fanner. (athom, ) Modified on 12/30/2020 to attach correct PDF (athom, ). |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Default Judgment by Plaintiff Jamie Fanner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2, #2 Exhibit 3, #3 Exhibit 4) (athom, ) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time by Plaintiff Jamie Fanner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (rvill, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint by Defendant TTEC-F-K-A Telle Tech Holdings Inc. (DiCuollo, Michelle) |
| Filing 7 Employee Discrimination COMPLAINT against TTEC-F-K-A Telle Tech Holdings Inc, filed by Jamie Fanner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (athom, ) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service, filed by Plaintiff Jamie Fanner. (athom, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies. If Plaintiff fails to cure all of the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. The Application (Short Form) (ECF No. #3 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as on the incorrect form, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/30/2020. forms mailed as ordered (angar, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk and emailed back to Plaintiff on 11/27/2020. (alave, ) |
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Jamie Fanner. (alave, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (alave, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Employment Discrimination against TTEC-F-K-A Telle Tech Holdings Inc, filed by Jamie Fanner. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(alave, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fanner v. TTEC-F-K-A Telle Tech Holdings Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TTEC-F-K-A Telle Tech Holdings Inc | |
| Represented By: | Michelle Lynn Gomez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jamie Fanner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
