McGlochlin v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Roy McGlochlin
Defendant: Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2020cv03599
Filed: December 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Daniel D Domenico
Referring Judge: Michael E Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2021 Filing 32 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading re #31 Amended Complaint, AND JURY DEMAND by Plaintiff Roy McGlochlin (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT 1)(Taussig, John)
February 3, 2021 Filing 31 AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Auto-Owners Insurance Company, filed by Roy McGlochlin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT 1, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT 2, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT 3, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT 4, #5 Exhibit EXHIBIT 5)(Taussig, John)
February 1, 2021 Filing 30 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information For Evan B. Stephenson by Evan Bennett Stephenson (Stephenson, Evan)
February 1, 2021 Filing 29 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information For Hannah R. Seifert by Hannah Rachel Seifert (Seifert, Hannah)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 19 January 2021. This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Due to a conflict in the Court's calendar, the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference currently set for March 17, 2021 is rescheduled to 11:30 a.m. on that same morning (Time Change Only) in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The litigants (counsel and parties) and the public may appear at the conference either in person or by telephone. (cmadr, )
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 27 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 14 January 2021. This matter comes before the Court upon the parties' Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time #24 . Noting that the Motion is unopposed and for good cause shown, the Motion is granted. The Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference currently set for January 27, 2021 is vacated and rescheduled to March 17, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint on or before February 3, 2021. Defendant shall file its answer or other response on or before February 17, 2021.(cmadr, )
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #24 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to file Scheduling Order and Reset Scheduling Conference filed by Roy McGlochlin. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 1/13/2021. Text Only Entry (dddlc3, )
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 13 January 2021. This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Due to a conflict in the Court's calendar, the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference currently set for January 20, 2021 is vacated and rescheduled to January 27, 2021, at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/20/2021. (cmadr, )
January 13, 2021 Filing 24 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to file Scheduling Order and Reset Scheduling Conference by Plaintiff Roy McGlochlin. (Taussig, John)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7 January 2021. For good cause shown, Plaintiff's "Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Scheduling Order and to Re-Set Scheduling Conference" #20 is granted.The Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference set for January 11, 2021 is vacated and rescheduled for January 20, 2021, at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/13/2021. (cmadr, )
January 6, 2021 Filing 22 ANSWER to #5 Complaint by Auto-Owners Insurance Company.(Stephenson, Evan)
January 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #20 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Proposed Scheduling Order and to Re-Set Scheduling Conference filed by Roy McGlochlin. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 1/6/2021. Text Only Entry (dddlc3, )
January 4, 2021 Filing 20 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Proposed Scheduling Order and to Re-Set Scheduling Conference by Plaintiff Roy McGlochlin. (Taussig, John)
December 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 12/24/2020. Text Only Entry (dddlc3, )
December 23, 2020 Filing 18 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. This case is randomly returned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-3599-DDD (angar, )
December 23, 2020 Filing 17 NOTICE of Filing of State Court Docket Sheet by Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet State Court Docket Sheet)(Seifert, Hannah)
December 23, 2020 Filing 16 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #15 . All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock. All future pleadings should be designated as 20-cv-03599-LTB. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, )
December 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 23 December 2020. Pursuant to the consent form filed by the parties declining consent under the D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(c) (ECF #14 ), the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(a). This Court may continue on the case to hear matters referred by the district judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and D.C. Colo. LCivR 72.1(c). (cmadr, )
December 22, 2020 Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company All parties do not consent.. (Seifert, Hannah)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 22 December 2020. For good cause shown, Defendant's "Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Conduct Rule 26(f) Meeting" #12 is granted. Defendant shall file an answer or other response to the operative complaint on or before January 6, 2021. Further, the parties shall conduct a meeting pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before December 28, 2020.(cmadr, )
December 21, 2020 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #5 Complaint and Conduct Rule 26(F) Meeting by Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Seifert, Hannah)
December 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9 December 2020. Consent Form due by 12/22/2020. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/4/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 1/11/2021 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (cmadr, )
December 9, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Hannah Rachel Seifert on behalf of Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyAttorney Hannah Rachel Seifert added to party Auto-Owners Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Seifert, Hannah)
December 8, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Elaine T. Corey on behalf of Roy McGlochlinAttorney Elaine T. Corey added to party Roy McGlochlin(pty:pla) (Corey, Elaine)
December 8, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Scott David Smith on behalf of Roy McGlochlinAttorney Scott David Smith added to party Roy McGlochlin(pty:pla) (Smith, Scott)
December 8, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by John G. Taussig, III on behalf of Roy McGlochlinAttorney John G. Taussig, III added to party Roy McGlochlin(pty:pla) (Taussig, John)
December 8, 2020 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (cpomm, )
December 8, 2020 Filing 5 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Auto-Owners Insurance Company, filed by Roy McGlochlin.(cpomm, )
December 8, 2020 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry (cpomm, )
December 8, 2020 Filing 3 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (cpomm, )
December 8, 2020 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Stephenson, Evan)
December 8, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Auto-Owners Insurance Company from Boulder County District Court, Case Number 2020cv30824. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number 1082-7621634), filed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #2 STATE COURT -Complaint and Jury Demand, #3 STATE COURT - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 STATE COURT - Summons, #5 STATE COURT - Waiver and Acceptance of Service of Complaint, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Stephenson, Evan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McGlochlin v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy McGlochlin
Represented By: John G. Taussig, III
Represented By: Scott David Smith
Represented By: Elaine T. Corey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Represented By: Evan Bennett Stephenson
Represented By: Hannah Rachel Seifert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?