Betts v. Winden
| Terry Betts |
| Mathew Winden |
| 1:2020cv03797 |
| December 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as of January 27, 2021, pursuant to Petitioners notice of voluntary dismissal (ECF No. #10 ). IFP on appeal is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 02/03/2021. (athom, )
|
| Filing 10 Request to Voluntarily Dismiss Action Without Prejudice by Petitioner Terry Betts. (athom, ) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 01/27/2021. Finding good cause to support the request, Respondent's motion for a 30-day extension of time to file a preliminary response (ECF No. #8 ) is granted. Respondent shall file a preliminary response on or before March 1, 2021. Any reply to Respondent's preliminary response shall be filed by Petitioner on or before March 31, 2021. (athom, )
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond To Petitioner's Application For Writ Of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Mathew Winden. (Woodward, Cole) |
| Filing 7 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE of the #5 Order to File Preliminary Response and #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Respondent Mathew Winden. (athom, ) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #5 Order,, (cpomm, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order Respondent shall file a preliminary response that complies with this order. Within thirty (30) days of the filing of the preliminary response Petitioner may file a reply, if he desires. If Respondent does not intend to raise the affirmative defense of timeliness or exhaustion of state-court remedies, Respondent must notify the Court of that decision in the preliminary response. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/30/2020. (athom, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/30/2020. (athom, )
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner Terry Betts. (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Terry Betts. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cpomm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Betts v. Winden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Terry Betts | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Mathew Winden | |
| Represented By: | Cole Jacob Woodward |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
