Chavez v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
Adrian Chavez |
Limon Medical Staff, CSP Medical Staff, Colorado Department of Corrections, Misty Zade, DRDC Medical Staff, Dean Williams, Randolph Maul, Fremont Medical Staff and Health Service Administrator |
1:2020cv03798 |
December 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 8 Request for Time Extension, by Plaintiff Adrian Chavez. (angar, ) |
|
Filing 6 PAYMENT RECEIVED from Adrian Chavez in the amount of $ 23.00; Receipt Number COX097618; Initial Payment. (rvill, ) |
|
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Adrian Chavez. (cpomm, ) |
Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Adrian Chavez. (cpomm, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against CSP Medical Staff, Colorado Department of Corrections, DRDC Medical Staff, Fremont Medical Staff, Health Service Administrator, Limon Medical Staff, Randolph Maul, Dean Williams, Misty Zade, filed by Adrian Chavez. (Attachments: #1 Request of CDOC Information, #2 Envelope)(cpomm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.