Clark v. CLV, Inc.
Eddie Clark |
CLV, Inc. doing business as Pivot Cycles |
1:2021cv00001 |
January 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
R Brooke Jackson |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by CLV, Inc..(Lake, Donald) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re 1 Complaint. CLV, Inc.'s answer is due 2/12/2021. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 1/27/2021. Text Only Entry(rbjsec, ) |
Filing 10 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint by Defendant CLV, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Lake, Donald) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eddie Clark. CLV, Inc. served on 1/8/2021, answer due 1/29/2021. (Gerber, Andrew) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (rvill, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic the Court will not hold a Scheduling Conference. The Court requests that counsel confer and attempt to agree on a schedule and submit a proposed scheduling order no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed pointing out any areas of disagreement. Please email the proposed order to Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov in Word format and efile into CM/ECF. The Court will review the proposed order and make such rulings as are appropriate. The proposed scheduling order should be prepared as described in the local rules. A copy of instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be downloaded from the Courts website www.cod.uscourts.gov/CourtOperations/RulesProcedures/Forms.aspx. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 1/4/2021. Text Only Entry (rbjsec.) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS REQUEST as to CLV, INC. d/b/a PIVOT CYCLES by Plaintiff Eddie Clark. (Gerber, Andrew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing of Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff Eddie Clark (Gerber, Andrew) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (cpomm, ) |
Filing 3 Report re Copyright: Report on the filing of an action emailed separately to the Director of the Copyright Office. (cpomm, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CLV, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7653348)Attorney Andrew Isaac Gerber added to party Eddie Clark(pty:pla), filed by Eddie Clark.(Gerber, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Clark v. CLV, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eddie Clark | |
Represented By: | Andrew Isaac Gerber |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CLV, Inc. doing business as Pivot Cycles | |
Represented By: | Donald E. Lake, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.