Profitt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Rachel Profitt |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 1:2021cv00044 |
| January 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Christine M Arguello |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company All parties do not consent.. (Phillips, Steven) |
Filing 14
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 2/4/21, Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 3/30/2021. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 4/6/2021 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #12 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.(Phillips, Steven) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, filed by Rachel Profitt.(Holton, Corey) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #3 Complaint with Jury Demand Attorney Steven Eric Phillips added to party State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company(pty:dft) by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.(Phillips, Steven) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Magistrate Judge Wang is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b). The parties should expect to be given a firm trial setting that is 90 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference and should be available for trial accordingly. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. The Magistrate Judge, at his/her discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/8/2021. Text Only Entry (cmasec)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Julia Helena Barotz on behalf of Rachel ProfittAttorney Julia Helena Barotz added to party Rachel Profitt(pty:pla) (Barotz, Julia) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Corey A. Holton on behalf of Rachel ProfittAttorney Corey A. Holton added to party Rachel Profitt(pty:pla) (Holton, Corey) |
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 5 STATE COURT ORDER Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. By Kandace Cecilia Gerdes, Denver County District Court Judge on 12/30/2020. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons, Complaint and Jury Demand, and District Court Civil Cover Sheet upon State Farm Automobile Insurance Company on 12/08/2020. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, filed by Rachel Profitt.(jtorr, ) |
| Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company from Denver County District Court, Case Number 2020CV34141. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number 1082-7661794), filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet Supp Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G)(Khan, Muliha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Profitt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Muliha Alia Khan |
| Represented By: | Steven Eric Phillips |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rachel Profitt | |
| Represented By: | Julia Helena Barotz |
| Represented By: | Corey A. Holton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
