Dunn v. Safeco National Insurance Company
| Deborah Dunn |
| SAFECO Insurance Company of America and Safeco National Insurance Company |
| 1:2021cv00066 |
| January 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| R Brooke Jackson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL: Five day Jury Trial set to commence 4/25/2022 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom A 902 before Judge R. Brooke Jackson with a Trial Preparation Conference on 3/23/2022 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom A 902 before Judge R. Brooke Jackson. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 3/3/21. (jdyne, )
|
|
Filing 18
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 8/10/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 9/10/2021. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 2/11/21. (Attachments: #1 redlined version) (jdyne, )
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Debra Ann Stevens on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Debra Ann Stevens added to party Safeco National Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Stevens, Debra) |
| Filing 16 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Safeco National Insurance Company. (Spano, Brian) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Kevin C. Flesch on behalf of Deborah DunnAttorney Kevin C. Flesch added to party Deborah Dunn(pty:pla) (Flesch, Kevin) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER: In light of the reassignment of this case to this Court the Scheduling Conference set 2/11/2021 before Magistrate Judge Hegarty is vacated. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this Court will not hold a scheduling conference. The Court requests that counsel confer and attempt to agree on a schedule and submit a proposed scheduling order by 2/4/2021 pointing out any areas of disagreement. Please email the proposed order to Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov in Word format and efile into CM/ECF. The Court will review the proposed order and make such rulings as are appropriate and will provide the parties with potential trial preparation conference and trial dates for you to choose from. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 1/27/2021. Text Only Entry (rbjsec. )
|
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. This case is randomly returned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-66-RBJ (angar, ) |
| Filing 12 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #11 . All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-00066-LTB. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 11
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 25 January 2021. Pursuant to the consent form filed by the parties declining consent under the D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(c) (ECF #10 ), the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(a). This Court may continue on the case to hear matters referred by the district judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and D.C. Colo. LCivR 72.1(c). (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Safeco National Insurance Company All parties do not consent.. (Spano, Brian) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #5 Complaint by Safeco National Insurance Company.(Spano, Brian) |
|
Filing 8
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11 January 2021. Consent Form due by 1/22/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due 2/4/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 2/11/2021 11:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Summons and Complaint upon Safeco National Insurance Company on 12/18/2020 (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Safeco National Insurance Company, filed by Deborah Dunn.(jsalz, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jsalz ) |
| Filing 3 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendant SAFECO Insurance Company of America (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Affidavit of Service, #4 Delay Reduction Order, #5 Complaint and Jury Demand, #6 Summons)(Spano, Brian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by SAFECO Insurance Company of America from Denver District Court, Case Number 20cv34246. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number 1082-7663824), filed by SAFECO Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint and Jury Demand, #2 Exhibit B - Return of Service, #3 Exhibit C - Summons, #4 Exhibit D - Notice to Counsel of Filing, #5 Exhibit E - State Civil Case Cover Sheet, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Spano, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
