Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Playing Field, LLC, The et al
| Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. |
| Playing Field, LLC, The doing business as The Playing Field and Michal Neppl |
| 1:2021cv00132 |
| January 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Kathleen M Tafoya |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. Michal Neppl served on 2/15/2021, answer due 3/8/2021; Playing Field, LLC, The served on 2/15/2021, answer due 3/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Janis, Ryan)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Setting Initial Case Deadlines by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 01/19/2021. Consent Form due by 3/17/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due 3/17/2021 (evaug )
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (trvo, )
|
|
Filing 2
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry. (trvo, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Michal Neppl, The Playing Field, LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7673576)Attorney Ryan Richard Janis added to party Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons The Playing Field, LLC, #3 Summons Michal Neppl)(Janis, Ryan)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
