I.S. v. Aspen School District
| I. S. |
| Aspen School District |
| 1:2021cv00195 |
| January 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Raymond P Moore |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0706 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER: Telephonic Scheduling Conference which had been set for 3/22/2021 with Magistrate Judge Nina Wang is hereby vacated; Scheduling Conference re-set for 5/25/2021 10:00 AM in Room 323 (Grand Junction) before Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Proposed Order due one week prior. At the time of the hearing, parties to call 888-363-4749, Access Code 3136546#. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on March 11, 2021. Text Only Entry (gpgsec, )
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/9/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER REASSIGNING MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This matter has its factual nexus in Pitkin County. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a), and as approved by the Chief Judge of the Court, the undersigned directs that the Clerk of Court reassign this action to Magistrate Judge Gallagher as the referral judge. All further filings in this case shall reflect the case number of 21-cv-00195-RM-GPG. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on March 9, 2021. (rvill, )
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/9/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/9/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
| Filing 11 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #10 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-00195-RM. (Text Only Entry) (nmarb, ) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff I. S. All parties do not consent.. (Nolt, Michael) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by I. S.. Aspen School District waiver sent on 2/24/2021, answer due 4/25/2021. (Raykin, Igor) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Justin H. Miller on behalf of Aspen School DistrictAttorney Justin H. Miller added to party Aspen School District(pty:dft) (Miller, Justin) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Michael W. Schreiner on behalf of Aspen School DistrictAttorney Michael W. Schreiner added to party Aspen School District(pty:dft) (Schreiner, Michael) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/25/21, Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference and Setting Deadline for Filing of Consent/Nonconsent Form. Consent Form due by 3/8/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 3/15/2021. Telephonic Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 3/22/2021 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
|
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (angar, ) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. This case is randomly returned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-195-NYW (angar, ) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No Summons Issued. (alave, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (alave, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aspen School District (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7680545)Attorney Igor Raykin added to party I. S.(pty:pla), filed by I. S..(Raykin, Igor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: I.S. v. Aspen School District | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: I. S. | |
| Represented By: | Igor Raykin |
| Represented By: | Michael Jeffrey Nolt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aspen School District | |
| Represented By: | Michael W. Schreiner |
| Represented By: | Justin H. Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
