Sharp v. Goodrich et al
Harley David Sharp |
Barry Goodrich, Dean Williams and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
1:2021cv00207 |
January 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Acknowledgement RECEIPT by Respondent Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The re: #10 Certificate of Service. (athom, ) |
Filing 11 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE of the #9 Order to File Pre-Answer Response and #5 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Respondent Dean Williams. (athom, ) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #5 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #9 Order to File Pre-Answer Response for Service of Process. (Attachments: #1 USPS Certified mail receipt) (jsalz, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO FILE PRE-ANSWER RESPONSE. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order Respondents Goodrich and the Attorney General of the State of Colorado shall file a pre-answer response that complies with this order. Within twenty-one (21) day s of the filing of the pre-answer response Petitioner may file a reply. If Respondents Goodrich and the Attorney General of the State of Colorado do not intend to raise the affirmative defense of timeliness or exhaustion of state-court remedies, Respondents must notify the Court of that decision in the pre-answer response. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 03/16/2021. (athom, ) |
Filing 8 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number COX098377. (athom, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER Denying Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #6 ) is DENIED. If Mr. Sharp fails to pay the $5.00 filing fee within the time allowed, the habeas corpus application will be denied and the action will be dismissed without further notice. The Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915 (ECF No. #2 ) is DENIED as improperly filed. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 02/25/2021. (athom, ) |
Filing 6 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action by Petitioner Harley David Sharp. (athom, ) |
Filing 5 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, filed by Harley David Sharp. (athom, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail to Petitioner, with a copy of this order, the following forms, along with the applicable instructions: Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action and Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. If Petitioner fails to cure all designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 01/25/2021. (athom, ) (forms and instructions mailed as ordered) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Petitioner Harley David Sharp. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 1 Petition Under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody, filed by Harley David Sharp. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jtorr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.