Johnson v. Johnson et al
| Jabari J. Johnson |
| Reginald Johnson and Lewis Babcock |
| 1:2021cv00457 |
| February 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Christine M Arguello |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT re: #4 Order Dismissing Case, by Clerk on 2/19/2021. (evana, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. That the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this case and close the action because Plaintiff has failed to comply with the sanction order entered in Johnson v. Hawkins, et al., No. 19-cv-03730- LTB, ECF No. 10 (D. Colo. Mar. 4, 2020). That pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) any appeal from this Order is not taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of appeal, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 2/19/2021. (evana, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Jabari J. Johnson. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Lewis Babcock, Reginald Johnson, filed by Jabari J. Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jsalz, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
