Gornichec v. Mackey et al
Robert Gornichec |
Jacob Mackey and Echo Mackey |
1:2021cv00548 |
February 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service by E-Mail and Mail by Clerk of Court re #4 Order Dismissing Case, to Helen.Doerer@judicial.state.co.us and County Court, El Paso County, Colorado, 270 S. Tejon St., Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80903. (angar, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Summary Remand. The Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form), ECF No. #3 , is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of this Court shall mail a certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of the County Court, El Paso County, Colorado, 270 S. Tejon St., Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80903, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/25/2021. (angar, ) |
Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Defendant Jacob Mackey. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document)(cpomm, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Removal of Action, filed by Jacob Mackey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(cpomm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.