Chapel Hills Realty LLC et al v. Otis Elevator Company
| Chapel Hills CH LLC, Chapel Hills Realty LLC and Chapel Hills Nassim LLC |
| Otis Elevator Company |
| 1:2021cv00565 |
| February 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Philip A Brimmer |
| Kathleen M Tafoya |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due 4/26/2021. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 04/06/2021. (evaug )
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/05/2021. Text Only Entry (pabsec2)
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/5/2021, re: #16 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Otis Elevator Company. ORDERED that the Orders to Show Cause, Docket Nos. 11, 15, are hereby DISCHARGED. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #15 by Counter Claimant Otis Elevator Company, Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Glinka Przybysz, Andrea) |
|
Filing 15
SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/26/2021. ORDERED that, on or before April 2, 2021, defendant shall show cause why this case should not be remanded due to the Courts lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 14 ANSWER/REPLY to #12 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Chapel Hills CH LLC, Chapel Hills Nassim LLC, Chapel Hills Realty LLC.(Downey, Thomas) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #11 by Counter Claimant Otis Elevator Company, Defendant Otis Elevator Company. (Glinka Przybysz, Andrea) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #7 Complaint and, COUNTERCLAIM against Chapel Hills CH LLC, Chapel Hills Nassim LLC, Chapel Hills Realty LLC by Otis Elevator Company.(Glinka Przybysz, Andrea) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/3/2021. ORDERED that, on or before March 12, 2021, defendant shall show cause why this case should not be remanded due to the Courts lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Thomas Edward Downey, Jr on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Thomas Edward Downey, Jr added to party Chapel Hills CH LLC(pty:pla), Attorney Thomas Edward Downey, Jr added to party Chapel Hills Nassim LLC(pty:pla), Attorney Thomas Edward Downey, Jr added to party Chapel Hills Realty LLC(pty:pla) (Downey, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (trvo, ) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Complaint and Summons upon Otis Elevator Company on 02/04/2021. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT against Otis Elevator Company, filed by Chapel Hills Realty LLC, Chapel Hills Nassim LLC, Chapel Hills CH LLC.(trvo, ) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 5 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (trvo, ) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Otis Worldwide Corporation for Otis Elevator Company. (Glinka Przybysz, Andrea) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Andrea M. Glinka Przybysz on behalf of Otis Elevator Company (Glinka Przybysz, Andrea) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal, CIVIL COVER SHEET (JS-44) by Defendant Otis Elevator Company (Glinka Przybysz, Andrea) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Otis Elevator Company from El Paso County, Case Number 2021CV030181. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number 1082-7735390), filed by Otis Elevator Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - State Court Summons, #3 Exhibit 3 - State Court Return of Service, #4 Exhibit 4 - State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Glinka Przybysz, Andrea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
