USA v. Ruger 10/22 .22 Caliber Rifle, Serial No. 822-02527 et al
| USA |
| Palmetto State Armory PA-15 Rifle, Serial No. PA063404 and Ruger 10/22 .22 Caliber Rifle, Serial No. 822-02527 |
| 1:2021cv00634 |
| March 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 0924 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/5/21 Setting Deadline for Filing of Consent/Nonconsent Form. Consent Form due by 5/30/2021. (nmarb, )
|
| Filing 6 WARRANT For Arrest of Property In Rem issued by Clerk. (nmarb, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR WARRANT for Arrest of Property In Rem, by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/10/21. (nmarb, )
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Complaint for Forfeiture by Plaintiff USA (Bohn, Kurt) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against Palmetto State Armory PA-15 Rifle, Serial No. PA063404, Ruger 10/22.22 Caliber Rifle, Serial No. 822-02527 Attorney Kurt J. Bohn added to party USA(pty:pla), filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Warrant for Arrest of Property, #3 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Bohn, Kurt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
