Trujillo v. Aurora Public Schools et al
David Trujillo |
Aurora Public Schools and APS Board of Education |
1:2021cv00690 |
March 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
William J Martinez |
Nina Y Wang |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 623 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7 April 2021.Proposed Scheduling Order due 5/26/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 6/2/2021 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All participants shall use the following dial-in information: 888-363-4749, Access Code: 5738976#. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Michael W. Schreiner on behalf of APS Board of Education, Aurora Public SchoolsAttorney Michael W. Schreiner added to party APS Board of Education(pty:dft), Attorney Michael W. Schreiner added to party Aurora Public Schools(pty:dft) (Schreiner, Michael) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by David Trujillo. All Defendants. (Raykin, Igor) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2020 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/ 12/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Magistrate Judge Wang, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned to this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Referral Order, in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/12/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No summons issued. (jsalz, ) |
Filing 3 ADVISORY NOTICE TO ATTORNEY AND COURT: Under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3(a), Igor Raykin was administratively removed from the court's attorney roll and barred from filing electronically under CM/ECF for failing to pay the 2020 Biennial Fee. Counsel must complete a Bar/ECF application through counsel's existing Attorney Services Portal account and pay the full application fee to be restored to the attorney roll and CM/ECF. Upon reinstatement, counsel must file a Notice of Entry of Appearance in this case. (Text Only Entry) (mfred) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7751940)Attorney Igor Raykin added to party David Trujillo(pty:pla), filed by David Trujillo.(Raykin, Igor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.