Pham v. Clear Screening Technologies LLC et al
Plaintiff: Khahn Pham
Defendant: Clear Screening Technologies LLC doing business as Clear Checks and Aeva Specialty Pharmacy
Case Number: 1:2021cv00703
Filed: March 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Scott T Varholak
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Aeva LLC dba Aeva Specialty Pharmacy ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against Khahn Pham by Aeva Specialty Pharmacy.(Calamunci, Anthony)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion to Continue. Consent Form due by 6/8/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due 6/15/2021. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 5/24/2021 is VACATED and RESET for 6/22/2021 09:45 AM before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. The parties shall participate in the Conference by calling 888.808.6929 at the scheduled time and utilizing access code: 2805116#. The Court notes that the parties may hear the conclusion of a prior hearing at the time they call in, and are instructed to simply wait until their case is called. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/27/2021. Text Only Entry(stvlc2, )
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference by Plaintiff Khahn Pham. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Lemberg, Sergei)
April 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Khahn Pham. Clear Screening Technologies LLC waiver sent on 4/8/2021, answer due 6/7/2021. (Lemberg, Sergei)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Frank Christopher Porada on behalf of Aeva Specialty PharmacyAttorney Frank Christopher Porada added to party Aeva Specialty Pharmacy(pty:dft) (Porada, Frank)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Because D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1 requires no order from the Court, the parties agreed upon extension was effective upon filing of the stipulation and Defendant Aeva Specialty Pharmacy shall have until 4/30/2021 in which to file an answer or otherwise respond. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 3/29/2021. Text Only Entry(stvlc2, )
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer, Move or Respond to Complaint by Defendant Aeva Specialty Pharmacy. (Calamunci, Anthony)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Khahn Pham. Aeva Specialty Pharmacy served on 3/19/2021, answer due 4/9/2021. (Lemberg, Sergei)
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Sergei Lemberg on behalf of Khahn Pham (Lemberg, Sergei)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 5/24/2021 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Consent Form due by 5/10/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due 5/17/2021, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 3/9/2021. (jgonz, )
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ADVISORY NOTICE TO ATTORNEY AND COURT: Under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3(a), Sergei Lemberg was administratively removed from the court's attorney roll and barred from filing electronically under CM/ECF for failing to pay the 2020 Biennial Fee. Counsel must complete a Bar/ECF application through counsel's existing Attorney Services Portal account and pay the full application fee to be restored to the attorney roll and CM/ECF. Upon reinstatement, counsel must file a Notice of Entry of Appearance in this case. (Text Only Entry) (mfred)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cpomm, )
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (cpomm, )
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Clear Screening Technologies LLC dba Clear Checks; Aeva Specialty Pharmacy by Plaintiff Khahn Pham. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Lemberg, Sergei)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aeva Specialty Pharmacy, Clear Screening Technologies LLC dba Clear Checks (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7753227)Attorney Sergei Lemberg added to party Khahn Pham(pty:pla), filed by Khahn Pham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lemberg, Sergei)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pham v. Clear Screening Technologies LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clear Screening Technologies LLC doing business as Clear Checks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aeva Specialty Pharmacy
Represented By: Frank Christopher Porada
Represented By: Anthony Joseph Calamunci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Khahn Pham
Represented By: Sergei Lemberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?