Bracken v. Williams
| Roderick D Bracken |
| Dean Williams |
| 1:2021cv00787 |
| March 16, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Defendant's MOTION to Proceed, by Petitioner Roderick D Bracken. (angar, ) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to #6 Order,, to File Pre-Answer Response by Respondent Dean WilliamsAttorney Ellen E. Michaels added to party Dean Williams(pty:res). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Appendix, #10 Appendix)(Michaels, Ellen) |
| Filing 9 Acknowledgement RECEIPT on behalf of The Attorney General of the State of Colorado re: #7 Certificate of Service. (athom, ) |
| Filing 8 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE of the #6 Order to File Pre-Answer Response and #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Respondent Dean Williams. (athom, ) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #6 Order to File Pre-Answer Response for Service of Process. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER TO FILE PRE-ANSWER RESPONSE. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response that complies with this order. Within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply, if he desires. If Respondents do not intend to raise either of the affirmative defenses of timeliness or exhaustion of state court remedies, Respondents must notify the Court of that decision in the Pre-Answer Response. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 04/12/2021. (athom, )
|
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number COX098589. (athom, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. If Applicant fails to cure the designated deficiency within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 03/18/2021. (athom, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner Roderick D Bracken. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Roderick D Bracken. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jsalz, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bracken v. Williams | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Roderick D Bracken | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Dean Williams | |
| Represented By: | Ellen E. Michaels |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
