Sealand v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc. et al
| Orlen Sealand |
| John Doe, Enterprise Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car and Enterprise Holdings, Inc. John Doe, Individual doing business as Enterprise Rent-A-Car |
| 1:2021cv00849 |
| March 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 CERTIFICATE of Service by E-Mail by Clerk of Court re #13 MOTION to Withdraw Notice of Removal, 22 Order on Motion to Withdraw, #21 Response to Motion to genevieve.rotella@judicial.state.co.us at Denver County District Court. Text Only Entry (jgonz, ) |
| Filing 23 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to the Order to Remand filed in this case 4/13/2021. Text Only Entry (jgonz, ) |
Filing 22
ORDER granting #13 Motion to Withdraw. This matter is remanded to Denver County District Court. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/13/2021. Text Only Entry(stvlc2, )
|
| Filing 21 RESPONSE to #13 MOTION to Withdraw Notice of Removal filed by Plaintiff Orlen Sealand. (Fossenier, Michael) |
|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER This matter is before the Court on #13 MOTION to Withdraw Notice of Removal. Plaintiff shall file a response to the motion indicating its position on or before 4/19/2021. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/12/2021. Text Only Entry (stvlc2, )
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to the consent of the parties to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge #18 , this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/09/2021. Text Only Entry (pabsec2)
|
| Filing 18 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Enterprise Holdings, Inc. All parties consent.. (Jachimiak, Mark) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER This matter is before the Court on #16 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Enterprise Holdings, Inc. That form does not include the signature of Plaintiff's attorney and therefore does not appropriately indicate the consent of all the parties. The parties shall jointly file a new form indicating consent/nonconsent to United States Magistrate Judge jurisdiction on or before 4/12/2021. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/8/2021. Text Only Entry (stvlc2, )
|
| Filing 16 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Enterprise Holdings, Inc. All parties consent.. (Jachimiak, Mark) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Michael Paul Fossenier on behalf of Orlen SealandAttorney Michael Paul Fossenier added to party Orlen Sealand(pty:pla) (Fossenier, Michael) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER In light of #13 MOTION to Withdraw, the parties shall file the form indicating consent/nonconsent to magistrate judge jurisdiction on or before 4/7/2021. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 3/29/2021. Text Only Entry (stvlc2, )
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Withdraw Notice of Removal by Defendant Enterprise Holdings, Inc.. (Jachimiak, Mark) |
| Filing 12 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (alave, ) |
| Filing 11 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (alave, ) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Civil Summons and Civil Complaint upon Enterprise Holdings on 03/03/2021. (alave, ) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Civil Summons and Petition-Circuit Personally upon Enterprise Holdings, Inc. on 03/03/2021. (alave, ) |
| Filing 7 PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT against Enterprise Holdings, Inc., filed by Orlen Sealand.(alave, ) |
| Filing 6 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (alave, ) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Enterprise Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car.(Jachimiak, Mark) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Jachimiak, Mark) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Mark Joseph Jachimiak on behalf of Enterprise Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car (Jachimiak, Mark) |
| Filing 2 Exhibits in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant Enterprise Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J)(Jachimiak, Mark) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Enterprise Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car from Denver County District Court, Case Number 2020CV33951. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number 1082-7779091), filed by Enterprise Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car.(Jachimiak, Mark) |
| Filing 10 STATE COURT ORDER GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Process. By |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
