Collins v. Barela
| John Collins |
| Austin Barela |
| 1:2021cv00863 |
| March 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 fa |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Proposed Scheduling Order Joint by Defendant Austin Barela. (Haidari, Raana) |
Filing 13
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to the consent of the parties to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge #12 , this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/11/2021. Text Only Entry (pabsec2)
|
| Filing 12 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Austin Barela All parties consent.. (Haidari, Raana) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Raana V. Haidari on behalf of Austin BarelaAttorney Raana V. Haidari added to party Austin Barela(pty:dft) (Haidari, Raana) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Collins. Austin Barela served on 5/4/2021, answer due 5/25/2021. (Bryan, John) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Restrict. The Clerk of the Court is directed to restrict Dkt. No. 1 to Level 2 restriction. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/20/2021. Text Only Entry(stvlc2, )
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jgonz, ) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Austin Barela re #5 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff John Collins. (Bryan, John) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Restrict by Plaintiff John Collins. (Bryan, John) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Austin Barela, filed by John Collins.(Bryan, John) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 5/25/2021 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Consent Form due by 5/11/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due 5/18/2021, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 3/25/2021. (jgonz, )
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No Summons Issued (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Austin Barela (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7781669)Attorney John Spencer Bryan added to party John Collins(pty:pla), filed by John Collins.(Bryan, John) Modified on 4/20/2021 restrict level 2.(jgonz, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Collins v. Barela | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Collins | |
| Represented By: | John Spencer Bryan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Austin Barela | |
| Represented By: | Raana V. Haidari |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
