Sgaggio v. Spurlock
| Delbert Sgaggio |
| Tony Spurlock |
| 1:2021cv00893 |
| March 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Philip A Brimmer |
| Kathleen M Tafoya |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (sphil, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Tony Spurlock re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Delbert Sgaggio. (Sgaggio, Delbert) |
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya for all motions. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/02/2021. Text Only Entry (pabsec2)
|
| Filing 4 CASE REASSIGNED. This case was originally assigned incorrectly. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, the case has been directly reassigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-00893-PAB. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Trial Demand against Tony Spurlock Filing Fee: $402 Receipt Number:COX098540, filed by Delbert Sgaggio. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cpomm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sgaggio v. Spurlock | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tony Spurlock | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Delbert Sgaggio | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
