USA v. 7032 Mustang Rim Drive, Colorado Springs, Colorado
USA |
7032 Mustang Rim Drive, Colorado Springs, Colorado |
Carlos R. Torres |
1:2021cv00919 |
March 31, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Kathleen M Tafoya |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
18 U.S.C. ยง 0981 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Claimant Carlos R. Torres. (jgonz, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Complaint for Forfeiture by Plaintiff USA (Andrews, Tonya) |
Filing 5 ORDER: On 6/1/2021, and on the first business day of each month thereafter, the plaintiff shall file a status report regarding this matter and whether a scheduling conference should be set. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/1/2021. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 ) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No summons issued. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Lis Pendens by Plaintiff USA (Andrews, Tonya) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against 7032 Mustang Rim Drive, Colorado Springs, Colorado Attorney Tonya Shotwell Andrews added to party USA(pty:pla), filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Andrews, Tonya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.