Crutchley v. Dillon Police Department
| Michael Crutchley |
| Dillon Police Department |
| 1:2021cv01058 |
| April 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Christine M Arguello |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (evana, ) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Dillon Police Department re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Michael Crutchley. (Quinlivan, Meredith) |
Filing 6
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 19 April 2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due 7/8/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 7/15/2021 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. The litigants (counsel and parties) and the public may appear at the conference either in person or by telephone. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Magistrate Judge Hegarty is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b). The parties should expect to be given a firm trial setting that is 90 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference and should be available for trial accordingly. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. The Magistrate Judge, at his/her discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/16/2021. Text Only Entry (cmasec)
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No summons issued. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 2 Administrative Notice: Duplicate filing fee received. Financial notified and a refund is pending. (Text Only Entry) (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7820561) Attorney Meredith Ann Quinlivan added to party Michael Crutchley (pty:pla), filed by Michael Crutchley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Quinlivan, Meredith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crutchley v. Dillon Police Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Crutchley | |
| Represented By: | Meredith Ann Quinlivan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dillon Police Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
