Crown Castle Fiber LLC v. City and County of Denver
| Crown Castle Fiber LLC |
| City and County of Denver |
| 1:2021cv01070 |
| April 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. § 0332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 AMENDED COMPLAINT against City and County of Denver, filed by Crown Castle Fiber LLC.(Thompson, Thomas) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Michele Annette Horn on behalf of City and County of DenverAttorney Michele Annette Horn added to party City and County of Denver(pty:dft) (Horn, Michele) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading by Plaintiff Crown Castle Fiber LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Redlined First Amended Complaint)(Thompson, Thomas) |
Filing 19
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 6/9/2021. Text Only Entry (dddlc3, )
|
| Filing 18 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #17 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-01070-DDD. (Text Only Entry) (nmarb, ) |
| Filing 17 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Crown Castle Fiber LLC All parties do not consent.. (Lockwood, Ellie) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant City and County of Denver. (Roberts, Joshua) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant City and County of Denver. City and County of Denver answer due 5/24/2021. (Roberts, Joshua) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Martin Andrew Plate on behalf of City and County of DenverAttorney Martin Andrew Plate added to party City and County of Denver(pty:dft) (Plate, Martin) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Nathan James Lucero on behalf of City and County of DenverAttorney Nathan James Lucero added to party City and County of Denver(pty:dft) (Lucero, Nathan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Joshua L Roberts on behalf of City and County of DenverAttorney Joshua L Roberts added to party City and County of Denver(pty:dft) (Roberts, Joshua) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/27/21, Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference and Setting Deadline for Filing of Consent/Nonconsent Form. Consent Form due by 6/8/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 6/15/2021. Telephonic Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 6/22/2021 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Crown Castle Fiber LLC. City and County of Denver served on 4/19/2021, answer due 5/10/2021. (Lockwood, Ellie) |
| Filing 9 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #8 Order of Recusal. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-01070-NYW. (Text Only Entry) (jgonz, ) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER OF RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/19/2021. (jgonz, )
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Thomas Scott Thompson on behalf of Crown Castle Fiber LLCAttorney Thomas Scott Thompson added to party Crown Castle Fiber LLC(pty:pla) (Thompson, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Michael E. Lindsay on behalf of Crown Castle Fiber LLCAttorney Michael E. Lindsay added to party Crown Castle Fiber LLC(pty:pla) (Lindsay, Michael) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Crown Castle Fiber Holdings Corp, Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Other Affiliate Crown Castle Operating Company, Other Affiliate Crown Castle International Corp., Other Affiliate Crown Castle Holdings Corp for Crown Castle Fiber LLC. (Lockwood, Ellie) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to City & County of Denver re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Crown Castle Fiber LLC. (Lockwood, Ellie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Crown Castle Fiber LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7822072)Attorney Ellie Lockwood added to party Crown Castle Fiber LLC(pty:pla), filed by Crown Castle Fiber LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lockwood, Ellie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
