Duncan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Group et al
| Joseph Duncan |
| Owners Insurance Company and Auto-Owners Insurance Group |
| 1:2021cv01126 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2 June 2021. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 16 COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Scheduling Conference held on 6/2/2021. FTR: A501. (cthom, ) |
| Filing 15 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendants Auto-Owners Insurance Group, Owners Insurance Company. (Seibel, Taylor) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 5/24/2021. Text Only Entry (dddlc2, )
|
| Filing 13 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #12 . All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-01126-DDD. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 12
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 24 May 2021. Pursuant to the form declining consent under D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(c) (ECF #11 ), the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(a). This Court may continue on the case to hear matters referred by the district judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and D.C. Colo. LCivR 72.1(c). (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendants Auto-Owners Insurance Group, Owners Insurance Company All parties do not consent.. (Seibel, Taylor) |
|
Filing 10
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 23 April 2021. Consent Form due by 5/20/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due 5/26/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 6/2/2021 10:15 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. The litigants (counsel and parties) and the public may appear at the conference either in person or by telephone. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Taylor Robert Seibel on behalf of Auto-Owners Insurance Group, Owners Insurance CompanyAttorney Taylor Robert Seibel added to party Auto-Owners Insurance Group(pty:dft), Attorney Taylor Robert Seibel added to party Owners Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Seibel, Taylor) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by John David Mereness on behalf of Auto-Owners Insurance Group, Owners Insurance Company (Mereness, John) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Ethan A. McQuinn by Ethan Andrew McQuinn on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Ethan Andrew McQuinn added to party Joseph Duncan(pty:pla) (McQuinn, Ethan) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 4 Defendants' ANSWER to #3 Plaintiff's Complaint and Jury Demand by Auto-Owners Insurance Group, Owners Insurance Company.(jtorr, ) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Auto-Owners Insurance Group, Owners Insurance Company, filed by Joseph Duncan.(jtorr, ) |
| Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Auto-Owners Insurance Group, Owners Insurance Company from Denver County District Court, Case Number 2021-cv-30971. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number 1082-7833351), filed by Auto-Owners Insurance Group, Owners Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Answer and Jury Demand, #2 Exhibit A - Civil Coversheet, #3 Exhibit A - Complaint and Jury Demand, #4 Exhibit A - Index of State Court pleadings)(Mereness, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
