Crownhart v. Internal Revenue Service
| Brittany Crownhart |
| Internal Revenue Service |
| 1:2021cv01167 |
| April 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Tax Suits |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 06/24/2021. Plaintiff's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24 (ECF No. #9 ) is DENIED as moot. In the Order of Dismissal entered June 8, 2021 (ECF No. #7 ), the Court denied Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. (athom, )
|
| Filing 9 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and Fed.R.App.24 by Plaintiff Brittany Crownhart. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document) (athom, ) |
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #7 Order of Dismissal on 06/08/2021. (athom, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Complaint and this action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to pay the $402.00 filing and administrative fee as directed. IFP on appeal is denied. All pending motions are denied as moot. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 06/08/2021. (athom, )
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Show Cause Why the Plaintiff Should Not be Intitled to Pay Such Fees or Cost by Plaintiff Brittany Crownhart. (athom, ) |
| Filing 5 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and Fed.R.App.P.24 by Plaintiff Brittany Crownhart. (athom, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Denying Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. If Plaintiff fails to pay the full amount of $402.00 within the time allowed, the Complaint and the action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 04/30/2021. (athom, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Brittany Crownhart. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Internal Revenue Service, filed by Brittany Crownhart. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Service Documents, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Envelope)(jsalz, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crownhart v. Internal Revenue Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Internal Revenue Service | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brittany Crownhart | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
