Redux Pictures v. Incuboom, Inc.
| Redux Pictures |
| Incuboom, Inc. doing business as Baxterboo |
| 1:2021cv01238 |
| May 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| William J Martinez |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 06/28/2021. For good cause shown, Defendant's deadline to answer or file other response is extended to July 13, 2021. Text Only Entry(mehlc1, )
|
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM regarding #13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by Incuboom, Inc.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/28/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Incuboom, Inc.. (Lemire, Peter) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant Incuboom, Inc... (Lemire, Peter) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Peter C. Lemire on behalf of Incuboom, Inc.Attorney Peter C. Lemire added to party Incuboom, Inc.(pty:dft) (Lemire, Peter) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Redux Pictures. Incuboom, Inc. served on 5/18/2021, answer due 6/8/2021. (Grossbardt, Jonah) |
|
Filing 9
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10 May 2021. Pursuant to the Order of Reference (ECF 6 ), this Court will hold the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference on July 28, 2021 at 10:45 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Proposed Scheduling Order due 7/28/2021. The litigants (counsel and parties) and the public may appear at the conference either in person or by telephone. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by William Serge Wenzel on behalf of Redux PicturesAttorney William Serge Wenzel added to party Redux Pictures(pty:pla) (Wenzel, William) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2020 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/ 6/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Magistrate Judge Hegarty, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned to this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Referral Order, in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/6/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (alave, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (alave, ) |
| Filing 3 Report re Copyright: Report on the filing of an action emailed separately to the Director of the Copyright Office. (alave, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Attachments: #1 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Copyright)(Grossbardt, Jonah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Incuboom, Inc. dba BaxterBoo (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7853231)Attorney Jonah Adam Grossbardt added to party Redux Pictures(pty:pla), filed by Redux Pictures. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Grossbardt, Jonah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Redux Pictures v. Incuboom, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Redux Pictures | |
| Represented By: | Jonah Adam Grossbardt |
| Represented By: | William Serge Wenzel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Incuboom, Inc. doing business as Baxterboo | |
| Represented By: | Peter C. Lemire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
