Ratzlaff et al v. Summit Midstream Partners LLC et al
Plaintiff: Toby Cotton, Trevor Tabor and Tyler Ratzlaff
Defendant: Archrock Services LP and Summit Midstream Partners LLC
Case Number: 1:2021cv01519
Filed: June 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Christine M Arguello
Referring Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER: This matter has its factual nexus in Mesa County. According to the Court's Revised Jury Plan for Random Jury Selection, this case is therefore properly designated for Jury Division 3. Because the jury will be drawn from that Division, it is appropriate that the case be managed, for pretrial purposes, by Magistrate Judge Gallagher in Grand Junction. Accordingly, pursuant to D.C. Colo. L. Civ. R. 40.1(a), and as approved by the Chief Judge of the Court, the undersigned directs that the Clerk of the Court reassign this action to Magistrate Judge Gallagher as the referral judge. All further pleadings in this case shall reflect the case number of 21-cv-015199-CMA-GPG. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 7/27/2021. Text Only Entry (cmasec)
July 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Magistrate Judge Hegarty is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b). Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. The Magistrate Judge, at his/her discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 7/25/2021. Text Only Entry (cmasec)
July 23, 2021 Filing 21 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #20 Order. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-01519-CMA. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, )
July 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 23 July 2021. Pursuant to the consent form filed by the parties declining consent under the D.C.Colo.LCivR 40.1(c) (ECF #19 ), the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C.Colo.LCivR 40.1(a). This Court may continue on the case to hear matters referred by the district judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and D.C.Colo.LCivR 72.1(c). (cmadr, )
July 23, 2021 Filing 19 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiffs Toby Cotton, Tyler Ratzlaff, Trevor Tabor All parties do not consent.. (Holycross, Matthew)
July 15, 2021 Filing 18 COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Status Conference held on 7/15/2021, Case stayed.. FTR: A501. (cthom, )
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12 July 2021. This matter comes before the Court following Plaintiffs' Response to the Order to Show Cause. ECF #16 . The Court will hold a status conference regarding its Order to Show Cause and subject matter jurisdiction on July 15, 2021, at 10:45 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. (cmadr, )
July 6, 2021 Filing 16 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #4 by Plaintiffs Toby Cotton, Tyler Ratzlaff, Trevor Tabor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Affidavit of Toby Cotton, #2 Exhibit 2-Affidavit of Tyler Ratzlaff, #3 Exhibit 3-Affidavit of Trevor Taber, #4 Exhibit 4-Affidavit of Archrock)(Holycross, Matthew)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 30 June 2021. For good cause shown, Defendant Summit Midstream Partners, LLC's (Summit) Unopposed Motion for Extension to File Responsive Pleading to the Complaint #14 is granted. Summit shall file its answer or other response to the operative pleading on or before July 21, 2021.(cmadr, )
June 29, 2021 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Summit Midstream Partners LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Proposed Order)(McGath, Scott)
June 29, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Scott Alan McGath on behalf of Summit Midstream Partners LLCAttorney Scott Alan McGath added to party Summit Midstream Partners LLC(pty:dft) (McGath, Scott)
June 24, 2021 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Archrock Services LP served on 6/9/2021, answer due 7/21/2021. (Holycross, Matthew)
June 24, 2021 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Summit Midstream Partners LLC served on 6/9/2021, answer due 6/30/2021. (Holycross, Matthew)
June 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 24 June 2021. For good cause shown, Defendant Archrock Services LP's (Archrock) Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to the Complaint #9 is granted. Archrock shall file its answer or other response to the operative pleading on or before July 21, 2021.(cmadr, )
June 23, 2021 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Archrock Services LP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Goldstein, Tamir)
June 23, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Tamir I. Goldstein on behalf of Archrock Services LPAttorney Tamir I. Goldstein added to party Archrock Services LP(pty:dft) (Goldstein, Tamir)
June 23, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Robert B. Thompson, III on behalf of Archrock Services LPAttorney Robert B. Thompson, III added to party Archrock Services LP(pty:dft) (Thompson, Robert)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 21 June 2021. For good cause shown, Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Court's June 7, 2021 Order to Show Cause #5 is granted. Plaintiffs shall file their response to the order to show cause (ECF #4 ) on or before July 6, 2021.(cmadr, )
June 20, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Court's June 7, 2021 Order to Show Cause by Plaintiffs Toby Cotton, Tyler Ratzlaff, Trevor Tabor. (Holycross, Matthew)
June 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7 June 2021. It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs file a written response to this Order to Show Cause on or before June 21, 2021, demonstrating why the Court should not dismiss this case (or recommend that it be dismissed) without prejudice for the Court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (cmadr, )
June 7, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jsalz, )
June 4, 2021 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, )
June 4, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Jury Demand against Tyler Ratzlaff, Trevor Tabor, Toby Cotton (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7901574)Attorney Matthew M. Holycross added to party Toby Cotton(pty:pla), Attorney Matthew M. Holycross added to party Tyler Ratzlaff(pty:pla), Attorney Matthew M. Holycross added to party Trevor Tabor(pty:pla), filed by Tyler Ratzlaff, Trevor Tabor, Toby Cotton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons Archrock, #3 Summons Summons Summit)(Holycross, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ratzlaff et al v. Summit Midstream Partners LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Toby Cotton
Represented By: Matthew M. Holycross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trevor Tabor
Represented By: Matthew M. Holycross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyler Ratzlaff
Represented By: Matthew M. Holycross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Archrock Services LP
Represented By: Robert B. Thompson, III
Represented By: Tamir I. Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Summit Midstream Partners LLC
Represented By: Scott Alan McGath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?