McClam v. Ternes et al
Eric Jerome McClam |
Cheryl Ternes and Secretary of State Jena Griswold |
1:2021cv01563 |
June 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JUDGMENT re: #5 Order Dismissing Case, by Clerk on 7/13/2021. (evana, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. That the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to prosecute and cure the deficiencies as directed. That leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice. That the Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is denied as moot, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 7/13/2021. (evana, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response tothis order must include the civil action number on this order, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 6/10/2021. (evana, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 2 Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal in Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Eric Jerome McClam. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Appeal by Plaintiff Eric Jerome McClam (jtorr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.