Angello v. Genesis Healthcare INC
Enid C. Angello |
Genesis Healthcare INC |
1:2021cv01569 |
June 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Daniel D Domenico |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Kathleen M Tafoya |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to the 16 Order filed in this case on 07/19/2021. Text Only Entry (athom, ) |
Filing 16 Order re #15 Stipulation of Dismissal of Case. Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendant's #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 7/19/2021. Text Only Entry(dddlc3, ) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Case with Prejudice by Defendant Genesis Healthcare INC. (Broderick, Matthew) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint by Defendant Genesis Healthcare INC. (Broderick, Matthew) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Matthew John Broderick on behalf of Genesis Healthcare INCAttorney Matthew John Broderick added to party Genesis Healthcare INC(pty:dft) (Broderick, Matthew) |
Filing 12 ORDER denying #7 MOTION to Amend Plaintiff's Original Civil Claim Submission Date to June 8, 2021. Plaintiff originally attempted to file her lawsuit by email at 4:55 pm on June 8, 2021, with jpeg images, despite instructions that unrepresented plaintiffs are required to submit their filings in Word or PDF format. See Optional Email Filing Instructions for Unrepresented Parties at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/RepresentingYourself.aspx. Plaintiff did not correctly file her case until June 9, 2021. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/7/21. Text Only Entry(kmtlc1 ) |
Filing 11 Return of Service Executed. Genesis Healthcare INC served on 6/24/2021, answer due 7/15/2021. (athom, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. It is FURTHER ORDERED that #7 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint is referred to Magistrate Judge Tafoya. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 6/22/2021. Text Only Entry (dddlc3, ) |
Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) (athom, ) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Complaint for Service of Process (Attachments: #1 USM-285) (athom, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Amend Original Civil Claim to June 8, 2021 by Plaintiff Enid C. Angello. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(evana, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER Drawing Case, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 6/11/2021. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-1569-DDD (angar, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER Granting Plaintiff #2 Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 6/10/2021.(angar, ) |
Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Enid C. Angello (trvo, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (trvo, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Enid C. Angello. (Attachment(s): #1 Exhibit) (trvo, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for a Civil Case Alleging Negligence against Genesis Healthcare INC, filed by Enid C. Angello. (Attachments: #1 Attachment III - Statement of Claim, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(trvo, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Angello v. Genesis Healthcare INC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Genesis Healthcare INC | |
Represented By: | Matthew John Broderick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Enid C. Angello | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.