Shumaker v. Eidos Architects, PC
Jackie Shumaker |
Eidos Architects, PC |
1:2021cv01669 |
June 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Scott T Varholak |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Reschedule August 19, 2021 Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference set for 8/19/2021 10:30 AM is VACATED and RESET For 9/7/2021 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. The parties may participate in the conference telephonically by calling 888.808.6929 at the scheduled time and utilizing access code: 2805116#. The Court notes that the parties may hear the conclusion of a prior hearing at the time they call in, and are instructed to simply wait until their case is called. The parties shall file the Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form on or before 8/24/2021, and shall submit a joint Proposed Scheduling Order on or before 8/31/2021. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 7/30/2021. Text Only Entry(stvlc1, ) |
Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Reset August 19, 2021 Scheduling Conference by Defendant Eidos Architects, PC. (Cardi, Philip) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to ComplaintAttorney Philip B. Cardi added to party Eidos Architects, PC(pty:dft) by Eidos Architects, PC.(Cardi, Philip) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jackie Shumaker. Eidos Architects, PC served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. (Calderon Baron, Sergio) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Calderon Baron, Sergio) |
Filing 5 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 8/19/2021 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Consent Form due by 8/5/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due 8/12/2021, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 6/18/2021. (jgonz, ) |
Filing 4 Report re Copyright: Report on the filing of an action emailed separately to the Director of the Copyright Office. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eidos Architects, P.C. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7919711)Attorney Sergio Calderon Baron added to party Jackie Shumaker(pty:pla), filed by Jackie Shumaker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit Exhibit1, #4 Exhibit Exhibit2, #5 Exhibit Exhibit3)(Calderon Baron, Sergio) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shumaker v. Eidos Architects, PC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jackie Shumaker | |
Represented By: | Sergio Calderon Baron |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Eidos Architects, PC | |
Represented By: | Philip B. Cardi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.