Rogers v. Vilsack et al
| Sara M Rogers |
| Zach Ducheneaux and Thomas J. Vilsack |
| 1:2021cv01779 |
| June 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 cr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to #8 MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Defendants Zach Ducheneaux, Thomas J. Vilsack. (Newton, Emily) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to #8 MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Plaintiff Sara M Rogers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh 1 - A Career Counselors Guide to Lateral Hiring at DOJ, #2 Exhibit Exh 2 - Order Denying Motion to Stay, #3 Exhibit Exh 3 - Choose Justice - Guide to U.S. DOJ for Law Students and Exp. Attorneys)(Bartkus, Corey) |
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #8 MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Thomas J. Vilsack, Zach Ducheneaux. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 7/22/2021. Text Only Entry (dddlc3, )
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Defendants Zach Ducheneaux, Thomas J. Vilsack. (Newton, Emily) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant(s) Zach Ducheneaux served on 7/8/2021, answer due 9/6/2021. (Bartkus, Corey) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant(s) Thomas J. Vilsack served on 7/8/2021, answer due 9/6/2021. (Bartkus, Corey) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Sara M Rogers All parties do not consent.. (Bartkus, Corey) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 7/6/2021. Text Only Entry (dddlc3, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Zach Ducheneaux, Thomas J. Vilsack (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7937497)Attorney Corey Christopher Bartkus added to party Sara M Rogers(pty:pla), filed by Sara M Rogers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Continuation of Main Document Notice of Related Cases, #3 Summons Thomas J. Vilsack, #4 Summons Ducheneaux)(Bartkus, Corey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
