Woodyard v. Cimarex Energy Co. et al
| Daniel Woodyard |
| Cimarex Energy Co., Thomas E. Jorden, Paul N. Eckley, Hans Helmerich, Kathleen A. Hogenson, Harold R. Logan, Jr., Floyd R. Price, Monroe W. Robertson, Lisa A. Stewart and Frances M. Vallejo |
| 1:2021cv01850 |
| July 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 10 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the court on the #9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, AND EXTEND DEADLINES IN THE COURTS ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NONCONSENT. The Motion is GRANTED IN PART. Ciramex Energy Co. shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before 10/22/2021. The Parties shall file the Consent/Nonconsent Form on or before 9/24/2021. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference is RE-SET for 11/18/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The Parties' Proposed Scheduling Order is due 11/12/2021. In addition, the Parties' remaining deadlines related to conducting a Rule 26(f) conference and exchanging initial disclosures are extended, in conjunction with the re-scheduling of the Scheduling Conference, consistent with the timelines set forth in this Court's #4 Order. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 08/25/2021. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, )
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF RELATED CASES by Defendant Cimarex Energy Co. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Wang v. Cimarex Energy Co. Complaint, #2 Exhibit Graff v. Cimarex Energy Co. Complaint, #3 Exhibit Elliott v. Cimarex Energy Co. Complaint, #4 Exhibit Lukosevicius v. Cimarex Energy Co. Complaint)(Davis, Nathan) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Davis, Nathan) |
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, AND EXTEND DEADLINES IN THE COURTS ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NONCONSENT by Defendant Cimarex Energy Co.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Davis, Nathan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Rachelle Silverberg by Nathan Kent Davis on behalf of Cimarex Energy Co. (Davis, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Nathan Kent Davis on behalf of Cimarex Energy Co.Attorney Nathan Kent Davis added to party Cimarex Energy Co.(pty:dft) (Davis, Nathan) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER: As of August 16, 2021, the public health risks caused by the coronavirus, and in particular, the Delta variant of the coronavirus, continue to be present. In order to support public health efforts to cabin the spread of the coronavirus, to protect the health of the Parties and counsel by minimizing their need to travel, and to protect the health of the general public, the following measures are adopted in an abundance of caution. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) All proceedings, notwithstanding any evidentiary proceedings, including but not limited to trials, which are scheduled to occur through January 1, 2022 and before the undersigned, shall be held via telephone conference, unless otherwise ordered by the court. Participants may access this court's conference line by using the following dial-in information: 1-888-363-4749, Access Code 5738976. This Amended Standing Order does not apply to any criminal matters; evidentiary civil matters; or other matters specifically set after the effective date to be in-person, presently scheduled through January 1, 2022; (2) All jury trials scheduled to occur through January 1, 2022 shall proceed as scheduled, pursuant to the District of Colorado's Jury Trial Protocols and its effective General Order(s), available at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/CourtOperations/COVID-19Guidance.aspx; and (3) Parties and/or counsel are advised to check information on the website of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/) and specifically, for Magistrate Judge Wang, for continuing information. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/19/2021. Text Only Entry (nywlc1, ) Text Only Entry (nywlc1, )
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Daniel Woodyard. Cimarex Energy Co. served on 8/4/2021, answer due 8/25/2021. (Sadeh, Daniel) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NONCONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/29/2021. A Scheduling Conference is set for 9/8/2021 01:00 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall complete and file the Consent/Nonconsent Form by 8/25/2021. The parties shall electronically file their proposed scheduling order and also provide a copy in Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or before 9/1/2021. (bwilk, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cimarex Energy Co., Paul N. Eckley, Hans Helmerich, Kathleen A. Hogenson, Thomas E. Jorden, Harold R. Logan, Jr., Floyd R. Price, Monroe W. Robertson, Lisa A. Stewart, Frances M. Vallejo (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7947984)Attorney Daniel Sadeh added to party Daniel Woodyard(pty:pla), filed by Daniel Woodyard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Sadeh, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
