Meggs et al v. Den 8888, LLC
John Meggs and Access 4 All, Inc. |
Den 8888, LLC |
1:2021cv01964 |
July 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
S Kato Crews |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Meggs, Access 4 All, Inc.. Den 8888, LLC served on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021. (Shadinger, Jon) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re: #1 Complaint, filed by attorney Jon Shadinger. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through the Attorney Services Portal Account pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases).(Text Only Entry) (jtorr, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Den8888, LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7967513)Attorney Jon G. Shadinger added to party Access 4 All, Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Jon G. Shadinger added to party John Meggs(pty:pla), filed by John Meggs, Access 4 All, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Shadinger, Jon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.