Graham v. Cooper
Petitioner: Albert Michael Graham
Respondent: No Named Respondent and Allen Cooper
Case Number: 1:2021cv01982
Filed: July 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Referring Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2021 Filing 14 JUDGMENT re: #13 Order Dismissing Case, by Clerk on 9/7/2021. (evana, )
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to cure the deficiencies and for failure to prosecute. That leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. That all pending motions are denied as moot, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/7/2021. (evana, )
August 13, 2021 Filing 12 AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Allen Cooper.(evana, )
August 13, 2021 Filing 11 Letter from Albert Michael Graham (evana, )
August 5, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for Proper forms and Instructions by Petitioner Albert Michael Graham. (evana, )
August 5, 2021 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed by Albert Michael Graham.(evana, )
August 5, 2021 Filing 8 Letter from Albert Graham (evana, )
August 5, 2021 Filing 7 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner Albert Michael Graham. (evana, )
August 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction and MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Petitioner Albert Michael Graham. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(evana, )
August 5, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Prosecutorial Discovery by Petitioner Albert Michael Graham. (evana, )
August 5, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel by Petitioner Albert Michael Graham. (evana, )
July 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES within thirty days of this Order and file an habeas corpus application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 if he intends to challenge the validity of his conviction and sentence or a 28 U.S.C. 2241 if he intends to challenge the execution of his sentence or a state pending criminal case, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 7/22/2021. (evana, )
July 21, 2021 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (cpomm, )
July 21, 2021 Filing 1 LETTER by Petitioner Albert Michael Graham. (cpomm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graham v. Cooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Albert Michael Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: No Named Respondent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Allen Cooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?