McNeill v. Choi et al
Plaintiff: Lawrence McNeill
Defendant: A. Choi and Carroll Lindgren
Case Number: 1:2021cv02072
Filed: July 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Referring Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2021 Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #8 Order Dismissing Case, #9 Clerk's Judgment, Order Reassigning Case Addressed to Lawrence McNeill. (evana, )
September 10, 2021 Filing 9 JUDGMENT re: #8 Order Dismissing Case, by Clerk on 9/10/2021. (evana, )
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING CASE that the "Civil Rights Complaint Form for Pro Se Prisoner Litigants in Actions Under 28 U.S.C. 1331 or 1346 or 42 U.S.C. 1983" (ECF No. #1 ) and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to cure the deficiency. That leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/10/2021. (evana, )
August 27, 2021 Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #5 Order, Addressed to Lawrence McNeill. (evana, )
August 16, 2021 Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #4 MOTION for Order to, #3 Statement, 2 Case Assigned to Judge, #1 Complaint Addressed to Lawrence McNeill. (evana, )
August 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. That the Clerk of Court is directed to mail to Plaintiff, with a copy of this order, one blank copy of the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and Prisoner Complaint forms along with the applicable instructions, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 8/2/2021. (mailed as ordered) (evana, )
July 29, 2021 Filing 4 Request that Colorado Attorney General's Office Provide Full Name of Each Defendant by Plaintiff Lawrence McNeill. (agarc, )
July 29, 2021 Filing 3 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Plaintiff Lawrence McNeill. (agarc, )
July 29, 2021 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (agarc, )
July 29, 2021 Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against A. Choi, and Carroll Lindgren, filed by Lawrence McNeill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(agarc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McNeill v. Choi et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence McNeill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. Choi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carroll Lindgren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?