Thomas v. Williams
Joel Thomas |
J. W. Williams |
1:2021cv02075 |
July 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Preliminary RESPONSE to #5 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus on Administrative Exhaustion by J. W. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A, Decl. of P. Trujillo, #2 Affidavit Att. 1 - SENTRY Report, #3 Affidavit Att. 2 - Remedy ID 1058617-F3)(Scarpato, Victor) |
Filing 13 Return Receipt of Service upon United States Attorney General (angar, ) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Victor William Scarpato, III on behalf of J. W. WilliamsAttorney Victor William Scarpato, III added to party J. W. Williams(pty:res) (Scarpato, Victor) |
Filing 11 Acceptance of Service upon US Attorney's Office (angar, ) |
Filing 10 Acknowledgment of Service on behalf of United States Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado (angar, ) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #7 ORDER to File Preliminary Response and #5 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus for service of process. (Attachments: #1 USPS Certified Mail Receipt) (angar, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER. Applicant's Motion and Affidavit Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #3 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. On August 20, 2021, Applicant paid the filing fee. (ECF No. #6 ), by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 9/2/2021.(angar, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER to File Preliminary Response. Within twenty-one days from the date of this Order Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 9/2/2021. (angar, ) |
Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number COX100120 (angar, ) |
Filing 5 APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Joel Thomas. (rvill, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiency within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August 2, 2021. (rvill, ) |
Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action by Petitioner Joel Thomas. (agarc, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Joel Thomas.(agarc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thomas v. Williams | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Joel Thomas | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: J. W. Williams | |
Represented By: | Victor William Scarpato, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.