Cordova v. Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff: Leah Cordova and Catalina Cordova
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 1:2021cv02154
Filed: August 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Scott T Varholak
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0051
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to the consent of the parties to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge #22 , this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/07/2021. Text Only Entry (pabsec)
October 7, 2021 Filing 22 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Starbucks Corporation All parties consent.. (Garnett, Andrew)
October 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MINUTE ORDER The parties may appear by telephone at the scheduling conference set for 10/21/2021. The parties can participate in the conference by calling 888.808.6929 at the scheduled time and utilizing access code: 2805116#. The Court notes that the parties may hear the conclusion of a prior hearing at the time they call in, and are instructed to simply wait until their case is called. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 10/6/2021. Text Only Entry (stvlc2, )
September 23, 2021 Filing 20 ANSWER to #18 Amended Complaint by Starbucks Corporation.(Garnett, Andrew)
September 10, 2021 Filing 19 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #18 Amended Complaint, #17 Amended Complaint filed by attorney Gabriel Schwartz. The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (agarc, )
September 10, 2021 Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Starbucks Corporation, filed by Catalina Cordova.(Schwartz, Gabriel)
September 10, 2021 Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Starbuck Corporation against Catalina Cordova, filed by Catalina Cordova.(Schwartz, Gabriel)
September 10, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Gabriel N. Schwartz on behalf of Catalina CordovaAttorney Gabriel N. Schwartz added to party Catalina Cordova(pty:pla) (Schwartz, Gabriel)
August 16, 2021 Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Garnett, Andrew)
August 16, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Andrew P. Garnett on behalf of Starbucks Corporation (Garnett, Andrew)
August 16, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jacqueline Ventre Roeder on behalf of Starbucks CorporationAttorney Jacqueline Ventre Roeder added to party Starbucks Corporation(pty:dft) (Roeder, Jacqueline)
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Setting Deadline for Filing Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to Magistrate Jurisdiction Form and Setting Scheduling Conference. Consent Form due on or before October 7, 2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due on or before October 14, 2021. Scheduling Conference set for October 21, 2021 11:30 AM in Courtroom A 402, before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 8/16/2021. (agarc, )
August 16, 2021 Filing 11 ANSWER to #5 Complaint by Starbucks Corporation.(Garnett, Andrew)
August 16, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE re 9 Minute Order,,, Amended Notice of Removal by Defendant Starbucks Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B, State Court Return of Service, #3 Exhibit C, State Court Civil Cover Sheet)(Garnett, Andrew)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER This matter is before the Court sua sponte upon the Court's review of the docket. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a), unless the court orders otherwise, a filing with the court that contains the name of an individual known to be a minor may include only the minor's initials. Here, the Complaint identifies the Plaintiff as a minor but the parties' filings all include the full name--rather than initials--of Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to place the Complaint, Notice of Removal, and all other filings referencing the minor's full name under Restriction Level 1. On or before 8/17/2021, Defendant shall file an Amended Notice of Removal and Plaintiff shall file a redacted version of the Complaint that comply with Rule 5.2(a). Counsel for Defendant shall promptly provide counsel for Plaintiff with a copy of this Order. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 8/10/2021. Text Only Entry (stvlc1, )
August 10, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Submission of State Court Register of Actions and State Court Pleadings by Defendant Starbucks Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Summons, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Delay Reduction Order, #3 Exhibit C - Division 204 State Court Delay Reduction Order, #4 Exhibit D - Plaintiff's State Court Motion to Dismiss 2nd Claim for Relief, #5 Exhibit E - State Court Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss 2nd Claim for Relief, #6 Exhibit F - State Court Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Garnett, Andrew) Modified on 8/10/2021 to add level 1 restriction pursuant to 9 Minute Order (agarc, ).
August 9, 2021 Filing 7 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (cpomm, )
August 9, 2021 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons, Complaint upon Starbucks Corporation on 7/19/2021 (cpomm, ) Modified on 8/10/2021 to add level 1 restriction pursuant to 9 Minute Order (agarc, ).
August 9, 2021 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Starbucks Corporation, filed by Catalina Cordova.(cpomm, ) Modified on 8/10/2021 to add level 1 restriction pursuant to 9 Minute Order (agarc, ).
August 9, 2021 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (cpomm, )
August 9, 2021 Filing 3 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (cpomm, )
August 9, 2021 Filing 2 Exhibits in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet by Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (Garnett, Andrew) Modified on 8/10/2021 to add level 1 restriction pursuant to 9 Minute Order (agarc, ).
August 9, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Starbucks Corporation from Arapahoe, Case Number 21CV31221. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-8010678), filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Return of Service, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Civil Cover Sheet)(Garnett, Andrew) Modified on 8/10/2021 to add level 1 restriction pursuant to 9 Minute Order (agarc, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cordova v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leah Cordova
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catalina Cordova
Represented By: Gabriel N. Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Andrew P. Garnett
Represented By: Jacqueline Ventre Roeder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?