Sabriye v. Geico Casualty Company
| Ahmed Sabriye |
| Geico Casualty Company |
| 1:2021cv02272 |
| August 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER Pursuant to #13 Proposed Scheduling Order, the Court understands that the parties have agreed that the scheduling deadlines in this matter should not be set until after the Court has ruled on the pending motion to remand [#10]. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference set for 10/20/2021 10:00 AM is VACATED. To the extent this matter is not remanded, within five business days after a ruling on the motion to remand, counsel for the parties shall jointly call chambers at 303.335.2365 to set the scheduling conference. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 10/13/2021. Text Only Entry (stvlc1, )
|
| Filing 13 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Ahmed Sabriye. (Larson, Scott) |
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Ahmed Sabriye. (Larson, Scott) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Defendant Geico Casualty Company. (Salg, Heather) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiff Ahmed Sabriye. (Larson, Scott) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 8/26/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due on or before October 13, 2021. Scheduling Conference set for October 20, 2021, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (agarc, )
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 8/25/2021. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, )
|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/24/2021. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-02272-DDD. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Geico Casualty Company, filed by Ahmed Sabriye.(jtorr, ) |
| Filing 3 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Salg, Heather) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Geico Casualty Company from Arapahoe County District, Case Number 2021CV31266. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-8033409), filed by Geico Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Salg, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sabriye v. Geico Casualty Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ahmed Sabriye | |
| Represented By: | Scott R. Larson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Geico Casualty Company | |
| Represented By: | Heather A. Salg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
