Lornes v. People, The/CDOC et al
| William Lee Lornes |
| People, The/CDOC and People of State |
| 1:2021cv02288 |
| August 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 LETTER by Plaintiff William Lee Lornes. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 5 LETTER by Plaintiff William Lee Lornes. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #3 Order of Dismissal on 8/26/2021. (trvo, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER of Dismissal. It is ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to comply with the sanction order restricting his ability to file pro se actions in the District of Colorado. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Lornes is denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/26/2021. (trvo, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 1 Mottion of Notice of Appeal Reply Aperence Rule 5565 15 Questioner Mandate of 30 Day Show of Cause Order of Judgment per Rule 121 Akhorky or Resoning to Proceed without Lince Attorney, filed by Plaintiff William Lee Lornes. (jtorr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
