Owens v. Harvard Collection Services, Inc.
| Stephanie Owens |
| Harvard Collection Services, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv02348 |
| August 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| R Brooke Jackson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Eric Donald Coleman on behalf of Stephanie OwensAttorney Eric Donald Coleman added to party Stephanie Owens(pty:pla) (Coleman, Eric) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Stephanie Owens. Harvard Collection Services, Inc. waiver sent on 9/1/2021, answer due 10/31/2021. (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER: The Court requests that the parties confer and attempt to agree on a schedule and submit a proposed scheduling order no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed pointing out any areas of disagreement. Please email the proposed order to Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov in Word format and efile into CM/ECF. Without holding a Scheduling Conference, the Court will review and enter the order making such rulings as are appropriate and will provide the parties with potential trial preparation conference and trial dates for you to choose from. If the parties prefer that the Court hold a Scheduling Conference, please notify Chambers via email by the date the proposed scheduling order is due and the Court's staff will provide you a date. The proposed scheduling order should be prepared as described in the local rules. A copy of instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be downloaded from the Courts website www.cod.uscourts.gov/CourtOperations/RulesProcedures/Forms.aspx. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 8/31/2021. Text Only Entry (rbjsec. )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Nathan Charles Volheim on behalf of Stephanie Owens (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Harvard Collection Services, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8049064)Attorney Nathan Charles Volheim added to party Stephanie Owens(pty:pla), filed by Stephanie Owens. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Volheim, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Owens v. Harvard Collection Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stephanie Owens | |
| Represented By: | Nathan Charles Volheim |
| Represented By: | Eric Donald Coleman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Harvard Collection Services, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
