Meggs et al v. 5970 E 64th, LLC
John Meggs and Access 4 All, Inc. |
5970 E 64th, LLC |
1:2021cv02406 |
September 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Philip A Brimmer |
S Kato Crews |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12181 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER This matter is set for a Telephonic Status Conference on 12/20/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. At the scheduled time, counsel shall call (888) 251-2909, access code: 5662814#. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in lieu of a Scheduling Order, the parties shall file a Status Report on or before 12/13/2021. In this Status Report, the parties shall detail whether any discussions have occurred regarding remediation, as well as the anticipated date that remediation will be completed. If discussions regarding remediation have not (or will not) occurred, the Status Report shall detail with specificity what discovery the parties anticipate shall be needed, as well as proposed timelines for this discovery. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall, nevertheless complete their Rule 26(a) disclosures by 12/13/2021. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 11/15/2021. Text Only Entry (amont, ) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by 5970 E 64th, LLC.(Halstead, Amanda) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by John Meggs, Access 4 All, Inc.. 5970 E 64th, LLC waiver sent on 9/13/2021, answer due 11/12/2021. (Shadinger, Jon) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Amanda Holland Halstead on behalf of 5970 E 64th, LLCAttorney Amanda Holland Halstead added to party 5970 E 64th, LLC(pty:dft) (Halstead, Amanda) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/10/2021. Text Only Entry (pabsec) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cpomm, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 5970 E 64th, LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8060426)Attorney Jon G. Shadinger, Jr added to party Access 4 All, Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Jon G. Shadinger, Jr added to party John Meggs(pty:pla), filed by John Meggs, Access 4 All, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shadinger, Jon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.