Jones v. Arrow Electronics Inc
| Marisa Jones |
| Arrow Electronics Inc |
| 1:2021cv02418 |
| September 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| William J Martinez |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jimmy Goh on behalf of Arrow Electronics Inc (Goh, Jimmy) |
| Filing 17 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Marisa Jones. (DeFazio, Ariel) |
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER: #14 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to File Its Response to Plaintiff's Complaint and Jury Demand is hereby GRANTED. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/01/2021. Text Only Entry (nywlc3, )
|
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM regarding #14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Arrow Electronics Inc. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/29/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
| Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant Arrow Electronics Inc. (Mangum, Erin) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER: Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue the Scheduling Conference #11 is hereby GRANTED. The Scheduling Conference is RESET for 11/9/2021 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The Proposed Scheduling Order is due 11/2/2021. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/19/2021. Text Only Entry(nywlc3, )
|
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM regarding #11 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference filed by Arrow Electronics Inc. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/18/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference by Defendant Arrow Electronics Inc. (Goh, Jimmy) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2020 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10 /14/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Magistrate Judge Wang, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/14/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
|
| Filing 8 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #7 Consent/Non-Consent Form to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge William J. Martinez. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-02418-WJM. (Text Only Entry). (alave, ) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Marisa Jones All parties do not consent.. (DeFazio, Ariel) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION by Defendant Arrow Electronics Inc. (Mangum, Erin) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NONCONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 09/22/2021. Consent Form due by 10/13/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due 10/20/2021. Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 10/27/2021 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang, via telephone conference. All participants shall use the following dial-in information: 888-363-4749, Access Code: 5738976. (alave, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marisa Jones. Arrow Electronics Inc served on 9/20/2021, answer due 10/11/2021. (Sweeney, Charlotte) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Arrow Electronics, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8062039)Attorney Charlotte Noelle Sweeney added to party Marisa Jones(pty:pla), filed by Marisa Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Sweeney, Charlotte) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Arrow Electronics Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marisa Jones | |
| Represented By: | Ariel Beryl DeFazio |
| Represented By: | Charlotte Noelle Sweeney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arrow Electronics Inc | |
| Represented By: | Erin Rayner Mangum |
| Represented By: | Jimmy Goh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
