Bruce v. City of Colorado Springs et al
Douglas Bruce |
City of Colorado Springs, Mark Lowderman, Pikes Peak Regional Building Department, Roger Lovell and El Paso County |
1:2021cv02427 |
September 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Regina M Rodriguez |
Kathleen M Tafoya |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Pikes Peak Regional Building Department, Roger Lovell. Pikes Peak Regional Building Department waiver sent on 10/15/2021, answer due 12/14/2021; Roger Lovell waiver sent on 10/15/2021, answer due 12/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Summons Waiver of Service of Summons - Lovell)(Hall, Eric) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Julie Brown Petersen on behalf of Roger Lovell, Pikes Peak Regional Building DepartmentAttorney Julie Brown Petersen added to party Roger Lovell(pty:dft), Attorney Julie Brown Petersen added to party Pikes Peak Regional Building Department(pty:dft) (Petersen, Julie) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Eric V. Hall on behalf of Roger Lovell, Pikes Peak Regional Building DepartmentAttorney Eric V. Hall added to party Roger Lovell(pty:dft), Attorney Eric V. Hall added to party Pikes Peak Regional Building Department(pty:dft) (Hall, Eric) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Nathan James Whitney on behalf of El Paso County, Mark LowdermanAttorney Nathan James Whitney added to party El Paso County(pty:dft), Attorney Nathan James Whitney added to party Mark Lowderman(pty:dft) (Whitney, Nathan) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Steven Andrew Klaffky on behalf of El Paso County, Mark LowdermanAttorney Steven Andrew Klaffky added to party El Paso County(pty:dft), Attorney Steven Andrew Klaffky added to party Mark Lowderman(pty:dft) (Klaffky, Steven) |
Filing 14 SUMMONSES issued by Clerk on 9/29/2021. (angar, ) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Roger Lovell by Plaintiff Douglas Bruce. (Garrett, Aaron) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Pikes Peak Regional Building Department by Plaintiff Douglas Bruce. (Garrett, Aaron) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Mark Lowderman by Plaintiff Douglas Bruce. (Garrett, Aaron) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS REQUEST as to El Paso County by Plaintiff Douglas Bruce. (Garrett, Aaron) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS REQUEST as to City of Colorado Springs by Plaintiff Douglas Bruce. (Garrett, Aaron) |
Filing 8 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to 7 Order of Recusal. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Regina M Rodriguez. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-02427-RMR-KMT. (Text Only Entry) (athom, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER OF RECUSAL pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455. On review of the pleadings, parties, and entries of appearance in this case, I conclude that I must recuse myself. The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to another District Judge or Magistrate Judge. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 9/17/2021. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due 12/1/2021. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/13/2021. (evaug ) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 9/10/2021. Text Only Entry (dddlc4, ) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/10/2021. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-02427-DDD. (trvo, ) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No summons issued. Summons submitted has incorrect caption and not issued. Please file completed summons for issuance using the event Summons Request. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Colorado Springs, El Paso County, Roger Lovell, Mark Lowderman, Pikes Peak Regional Building Department (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8063347)Attorney Aaron Christophe Garrett added to party Douglas Bruce(pty:pla), filed by Douglas Bruce. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to Colorado Springs, #3 Summons to El Paso County, #4 Summons to Mark Lowderman, #5 Summons to Pikes Peak Regional Building Department, #6 Summons to Roger Lovell)(Garrett, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.