Williams v. Amazon.com
Plaintiff: Janice Williams
Defendant: Amazon.com
Case Number: 1:2021cv02462
Filed: September 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Raymond P Moore
Referring Judge: Kathleen M Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2021 Filing 16 RESPONSE to Overturn the #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Janice Williams. (sdunb, )
November 1, 2021 Filing 15 DISCLOSURE by Plaintiff Janice Williams (sdunb, )
November 1, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Janice Williams (sdunb, )
October 13, 2021 Filing 13 MEMORANDUM regarding #11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Amazon.com. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 10/13/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec)
October 12, 2021 Filing 12 DECLARATION of Sarah Hebard regarding MOTION to Dismiss #11 by Defendant Amazon.com. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Goldmark, John)
October 12, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Amazon.com. (Goldmark, John)
October 12, 2021 Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Goldmark, John)
October 12, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by John Alexander Goldmark on behalf of Amazon.comAttorney John Alexander Goldmark added to party Amazon.com(pty:dft) (Goldmark, John)
September 24, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Janice Williams. Amazon.com served on 9/21/2021, answer due 10/12/2021. (evana, )
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court sua sponte upon review of this matter in which Plaintiff appears pro se. The Court strongly encourages Plaintiff to contact the Federal Pro Se Clinic which provides free assistance to people representing themselves in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. The Clinic cannot assist with criminal, bankruptcy, habeas, appeals, or any state cases. If Plaintiff wishes to avail herself of this service, she may make an appointment by phone (303-380-8786) or online at www.cobar.org/cofederalproseclinic. The Clinic is located at: Alfred A. Arraj Courthouse (first floor), 901 19th Street, Denver, CO 80294. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/14/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/14/2021. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/14/2021. (rmsec )
September 10, 2021 Filing 4 Conventionally Submitted Material : One SanDisk Flash Drive to Complaint #1 by Plaintiff Janice Williams. Location of Stored Items: Clerk's Office Oversized Area A-2-3. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, )
September 10, 2021 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No summons issued. (jtorr, )
September 10, 2021 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, )
September 10, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amazon.com (Filing Fee: $402, Receipt Number: COX100379), filed by Janice Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(jtorr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Amazon.com
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janice Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon.com
Represented By: John Alexander Goldmark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?