Edwards v. Oilex Inc
Plaintiff: Lawrence Edwards
Defendant: Oilex Inc A Colorado Corporation doing business as Grease Monkey and Wayne Glasser
Case Number: 1:2021cv02470
Filed: September 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Daniel D Domenico
Referring Judge: Kathleen M Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0216
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to #13 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Case. All claims asserted in this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 10/18/2021. Text Only Entry (dddlc4)
October 18, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case without Prejudice by Plaintiff Lawrence Edwards (Swan, Andrew)
September 30, 2021 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lawrence Edwards. Wayne Glasser served on 9/17/2021, answer due 10/29/2021; Oilex Inc served on 9/17/2021, answer due 10/29/2021. (Swan, Andrew)
September 29, 2021 Filing 11 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendants Oilex Inc, Wayne Glasser. Oilex Inc answer due 10/29/2021; Wayne Glasser answer due 10/29/2021. (Flink, Marc)
September 29, 2021 Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Flink, Marc)
September 29, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Nathan Andrew Schacht on behalf of Wayne Glasser, Oilex IncAttorney Nathan Andrew Schacht added to party Wayne Glasser(pty:dft), Attorney Nathan Andrew Schacht added to party Oilex Inc(pty:dft) (Schacht, Nathan)
September 29, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Marc David Flink on behalf of Wayne Glasser, Oilex IncAttorney Marc David Flink added to party Wayne Glasser(pty:dft), Attorney Marc David Flink added to party Oilex Inc(pty:dft) (Flink, Marc)
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/10/2021. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/14/2021. (evaug)
September 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 9/13/2021. Text Only Entry (dddlc4, )
September 13, 2021 Filing 5 CASE REASSIGNED. This case was originally assigned incorrectly and has therefore been randomly reassigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-02470-DDD. (Text only entry.) (norlin, )
September 13, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, )
September 13, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, )
September 13, 2021 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (norlin, )
September 13, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Wayne Glasser, Oilex, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8070564)Attorney Andrew Edward Swan added to party Lawrence Edwards(pty:pla), filed by Lawrence Edwards. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Consent to Become a Party Plaintiff, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Swan, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edwards v. Oilex Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence Edwards
Represented By: Andrew Edward Swan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oilex Inc A Colorado Corporation doing business as Grease Monkey
Represented By: Marc David Flink
Represented By: Nathan Andrew Schacht
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wayne Glasser
Represented By: Marc David Flink
Represented By: Nathan Andrew Schacht
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?