Invisible Structures, Inc. v. Airfield Systems, LLC
Plaintiff: Invisible Structures, Inc.
Defendant: Airfield Systems, LLC
Case Number: 1:2021cv02607
Filed: September 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Philip A Brimmer
Referring Judge: Scott T Varholak
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
Jury Demanded By: Both
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2021 Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Airfield Systems, LLC.(Talley, Evan)
November 24, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Evan W. Talley on behalf of Airfield Systems, LLCAttorney Evan W. Talley added to party Airfield Systems, LLC(pty:dft) (Talley, Evan)
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER Per the request of the parties, the Scheduling Conference set for 21/1/2021 is VACATED and RESET for 1/27/2022 10:45 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/20/2022. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 11/16/2021. Text Only Entry (stvlc2, )
November 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/14/2021. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
November 10, 2021 Filing 11 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #10 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-02607-PAB. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, )
November 10, 2021 Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Invisible Structures, Inc. All parties do not consent.. (Quiat, Laurin)
October 27, 2021 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Invisible Structures, Inc.. Airfield Systems, LLC waiver sent on 9/28/2021, answer due 11/27/2021. (Quiat, Laurin)
September 30, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Brendan E Clark on behalf of Invisible Structures, Inc.Attorney Brendan E Clark added to party Invisible Structures, Inc.(pty:pla) (Clark, Brendan)
September 28, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jared Alan Brandyberry on behalf of Invisible Structures, Inc.Attorney Jared Alan Brandyberry added to party Invisible Structures, Inc.(pty:pla) (Brandyberry, Jared)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING ELECTION CONCERNING CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION FORM AND SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 27 September 2021. Consent Form due by 11/17/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due11/24/2021 Scheduling Conference set for 12/1/2021 10:45 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (csarr, )
September 27, 2021 Filing 5 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (cpomm, )
September 27, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cpomm, )
September 27, 2021 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (cpomm, )
September 27, 2021 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Quiat, Laurin)
September 27, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified Complaint with Jury Demand against Airfield Systems, LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8094286)Attorney Laurin D. Quiat added to party Invisible Structures, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Invisible Structures, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4)(Quiat, Laurin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Invisible Structures, Inc. v. Airfield Systems, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Invisible Structures, Inc.
Represented By: Brendan E Clark
Represented By: Jared Alan Brandyberry
Represented By: Laurin D. Quiat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Airfield Systems, LLC
Represented By: Evan W. Talley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?